hat tip to One Bob:
A new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than 500 scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares. More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun’s irradiance. “This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850,” said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery. Other researchers found evidence that 3) sea levels are failing to rise importantly; 4) that our storms and droughts are becoming fewer and milder with this warming as they did during previous global warmings; 5) that human deaths will be reduced with warming because cold kills twice as many people as heat; and 6) that corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate. Despite being published in such journals such as Science, Nature and Geophysical Review Letters, these scientists have gotten little media attention. “Not all of these researchers would describe themselves as global warming skeptics,” said Avery, “but the evidence in their studies is there for all to see.”
Hudson Institute? Avery? Singer? You are KIDDING! LOL.
A quick glance at Hudson’s list of scholars and associates reveals a similar partisan tendency. Several current and former associates have supported the work of the neoconservative Project for the New American Century (PNAC), including Elliott Abrams, Hillel Fradkin, Francis Fukuyama, William Schneider Jr., Jeffrey Bergner, Richard Perle, Donald Kagan, and Dan Quayle.
Hudson Institute was founded by Herman Kahn, who once developed several “winnable nuclear war strategies”.
LOL. No thanks.
Eric:
Are you saying that since these scientists may be conservative they should be disregarded?